Photo by Caleb Woods on Unsplash
Across United States universities an unexpected wave of controversial commencement speeches has riled up graduates across the country, with speakers taking the opportunity to praise artificial intelligence on the big stage in front of students who have dedicated their money, time, and hearts to their education.
One of the most viral moments came at the University of Central Florida when commencement speaker Gloria Caulfield described AI as “the next industrial revolution,” only to be met with loud boos from arts, humanities, and media graduates in the audience.
And honestly, the reaction is understandable.
These were not engineering students celebrating Silicon Valley innovation. These were graduates entering creative industries already under pressure from automation: journalism, design, media, music, advertising, filmmaking, and the arts.
To them, AI is not some exciting futuristic concept. It is already competing with the careers they have spent years, and thousands of pounds or dollars, training for.
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt faced backlash was also met with boos during a separate commencement ceremony at the University of Arizona, highlighting the wider pattern of backlash around AI-themed speeches.
One of the most striking responses came from music industry executive Scott Borchetta, CEO of Big Machine Records, who was booed by graduates at Middle Tennessee State University after discussing the ongoing artificial intelligence revolution during his commencement address. Rather than soften the moment, Borchetta pushed back at the audience, dismissing the reaction and telling students to 'deal with it'. The exchange quickly spread online, with many interpreting his response as blunt and unsympathetic in a setting meant to celebrate graduates rather than challenge them.
The comment immediately came across as dismissive and arrogant, especially considering the setting. Graduation ceremonies are meant to celebrate students and encourage them about the future, not mock concerns from graduates already anxious about entering unstable industries.
The AI backlash also reflects a wider trend: graduation speeches are increasingly becoming battlegrounds for cultural debates.
In 2024, graduates reacted with outrage after Harrison Butker delivered a controversial and, for many, insulting commencement speech at Benedictine College in which he suggested many women would be “most excited” about marriage and children rather than careers.
The speech sparked widespread criticism online, particularly because it was delivered to graduates, many of them women, celebrating years of academic and professional achievement. Critics argued it reduced female ambition at the very moment students were entering the workforce.
In both cases, speakers walked onto a stage meant to celebrate students’ futures and instead touched on anxieties surrounding those futures. In 2024, it was gender roles and traditional expectations. In 2026, it is automation, job insecurity, and whether creative careers will survive the rise of AI.
A graduation ceremony is one of the few moments entirely centred on students and their achievements. It is meant to be a space where their work, their effort, and their future are the focus. So when the stage is used instead to praise technology, ideology, or wider cultural debates, it naturally creates tension. Because at its core, graduation is not supposed to be about the speaker, the industry, or the system waiting for graduates outside the hall. It is supposed to be about the graduates themselves, and for many, that balance now feels like it is being lost.
Add comment
Comments